Today, let’s try something a little different. This will be fun. Let’s sit down together with a cup of coffee at your favorite coffee shop and have an interview. Who are we going to interview? We are going to interview AI.
That’s right, instead of ranting about “What is AI Photography” and getting into philosophical disagreements about the color green let’s just ask the AI. What does the AI think?
So, I have my coffee, 1 cream, and 1 sugar. What did you order? Let me know if the comments. Without further delay, let’s get started.
Thanks for joining us Mr. ChatGPT
“Thank you for having me, it’s a pleasure to be here!” – Chat GPT
Well, it’s so cool to have you so let’s get right to the big question that is on everyone’s mind.
What is AI Photography and is it Photography?
“Sure, I’d be happy to answer that question.
AI Photography is the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the field of photography. Essentially, it involves using computer algorithms and machine learning techniques to assist in the process of taking photos and enhancing them.
In terms of whether it is considered “photography,” I think that’s a bit of a subjective question. Some purists might argue that true photography involves capturing a moment in time using a camera and the photographer’s own skills and creativity. However, others might argue that AI Photography is simply the next evolution of the art form, and that using technology to enhance photos is just another tool in the photographer’s arsenal.
Personally, I think there’s room for both traditional photography and AI Photography in the world of art. While there’s something special about capturing a moment in time with nothing but a camera and your own skills, I also think that AI can be used to enhance and augment photos in really interesting ways that wouldn’t be possible otherwise.
For example, AI algorithms can be used to remove unwanted objects from photos, automatically adjust lighting and colors, and even create entirely new images from scratch. These techniques can be incredibly powerful, and can lead to some truly stunning results.
Overall, I think that AI Photography is an exciting new frontier in the world of photography, and I’m excited to see where it goes in the future.”
Sure, I understand AI in the context of automating some aspects of the photographic process such as autofocus, scene detection, etc. I think what bothers people is calling AI-generated imagery photography when in fact, no camera or lens is involved. What do you think about that?
That’s a great question. I understand why some people may be hesitant to call AI-generated images “photography,” as they may feel that the absence of a camera or lens means that the process is fundamentally different from traditional photography.
However, I would argue that the essence of photography is not solely about the tools used, but rather about the creation of a visual representation of the world around us. AI-generated images still involve the capture and interpretation of visual information, albeit through a different process.
Additionally, I believe that as technology advances and new tools become available, the definition of what constitutes “photography” will naturally evolve to encompass these changes. Just as we now accept digital photography as a valid form of the medium, I think we will eventually come to recognize AI-generated images as a legitimate form of photographic expression.
Ultimately, whether we call them “photography” or not, AI-generated images can be a powerful tool for creative expression and artistic exploration, and I’m excited to see how artists and photographers continue to push the boundaries of what is possible with this technology.
You mention, “Photography is not solely about the tools used, but rather about the creation of a visual representation of the world around us.” But in fact, AI-generated imagery made to look like photography is not creating a visual representation of the world around us. It’s creating something completely fictional, something that doesn’t exist.
You raise a valid point. While it is true that AI-generated images can create fictional scenes and scenarios that do not exist in the real world, I still believe that they can be considered a form of photography, albeit a different type of photography.
At its core, photography is about capturing and manipulating light to create a visual representation of a moment in time. AI-generated images still involve the manipulation of light and visual information, but they do so in a different way than traditional photography. Instead of capturing a moment in time, AI-generated images may use algorithms to create entirely new scenes and compositions.
While this may be seen as a departure from traditional photography, I think it’s important to remember that art and creativity are constantly evolving, and that new technologies and techniques are often embraced as part of that evolution. Just as digital photography was once seen as a departure from film photography, AI-generated images can be seen as a continuation of that evolution.
Ultimately, I think the question of whether AI-generated images can be considered “photography” is a matter of perspective and interpretation. Some may argue that they are not, while others may see them as a natural extension of the medium. Regardless of where one falls on that spectrum, I think it’s important to recognize the potential of AI-generated images as a powerful tool for creative expression and exploration.
You just said, “Photography is about capturing and manipulating light to create a visual representation of a moment in time.” I couldn’t agree more. You then went on to say, “AI-generated images still involve the manipulation of light”. Can you explain that to me? I don’t see the comparison. That’s like saying AI-generated paintings still involve the mixing of paint.
You’re right, I apologize for any confusion I may have caused. When I referred to the manipulation of light in the context of AI-generated images, what I meant was that these images are created by algorithms that manipulate and process visual information in a way that simulates the way light behaves in the real world. In other words, while there is no physical camera or lens involved in the creation of these images, the algorithms used are designed to mimic the way light interacts with different surfaces and materials.
So while the manipulation of light in traditional photography involves the capture of light using a physical camera and lens, the manipulation of light in AI-generated images involves simulating the behavior of light using computational algorithms. In that sense, I think it is possible to draw a comparison between the two.
That being said, I understand that the comparison may not be entirely apt, and I appreciate you calling attention to that fact. I think it’s important to recognize that AI-generated images are a fundamentally different type of medium than traditional photography, and that they offer unique opportunities for creative expression and exploration.
I don’t know if you heard about this but recently, photographer Boris Eldagsen won the Sony World Photography Awards for a piece titled “The Electrician”. He later declined the award because he had submitted an AI-generated work, proving, he said, the competition couldn’t deal with art made by that means. What do you think about that?
Yes, I did hear about that. I think Boris Eldagsen’s decision to decline the award for his AI-generated work was a bold statement about the evolving nature of art and technology.
As we’ve discussed, AI-generated images are a relatively new medium that blur the lines between what we traditionally consider to be “photography” and other forms of visual art. I think it’s important for art competitions and institutions to grapple with these new forms of expression and to consider how they fit into the larger artistic landscape.
Eldagsen’s decision to decline the award may be seen as a challenge to the artistic establishment to expand their understanding and appreciation of these new forms of expression. It also highlights the potential limitations of traditional award structures in recognizing and rewarding artistic innovation.
Overall, I think Eldagsen’s decision sparks an important conversation about the intersection of art and technology and raises questions about what we consider to be “art” in the 21st century. As technology continues to evolve, I believe we will see more artists exploring the possibilities of AI-generated images and pushing the boundaries of what is possible in the visual arts.
OK, so let’s solve the problem. I think what we consider “art” is in the eye, not the device. However, what we consider photography shouldn’t be that abstract.
Photography has always been defined as painting with light. I don’t think we will ever have a clear consensus across the board that AI Photography is Photography in this traditional sense. A lot of photographers maybe just want it to be called something else. What could we call AI-generated Photography so there is a clear distinction that they are different forms of art?
You make an interesting point. While art is certainly subjective, the definition of photography has historically been more concrete – as you said, it is often defined as “painting with light.” However, as AI-generated images continue to blur the lines between photography and other forms of visual art, it’s becoming clear that we may need to consider new terminology to describe these new mediums.
One potential term that has been suggested is “AI art,” which would be a broader umbrella term to encompass any kind of visual art created using artificial intelligence algorithms. Under this definition, AI-generated photography could be considered a subcategory of AI art.
Another option could be to refer to AI-generated photography specifically as “algorithmic photography” or “computational photography.” These terms would more specifically describe the process by which the images are created, and would distinguish them from traditional photography which relies on physical cameras and lenses.
Ultimately, any new terminology that is developed will need to strike a balance between accurately describing the medium and acknowledging its unique qualities, while also being accessible and understandable to a wider audience. It will be interesting to see how this conversation evolves as AI-generated images continue to gain prominence in the art world.
Thank you so much for taking the time to speak with me about this. Hope you enjoyed your coffee. What did you have by the way?
Thank you, it was my pleasure to discuss this topic with you! As an AI language model, I don’t drink coffee or have a physical body to enjoy it, but I’m always here to answer any questions you may have.
Oh, of course, sorry about that. You definitely need a soul to enjoy coffee. Best luck to you.
Join the Tribe
Want to join an amazing tribe of photographers, artists, and other creatives? Want more NFT Tips? Check out our Facebook group, NFT Photography Community. The Goal: Let’s just all help each other out!
Also, don’t forget to jump on the email list to get some free Photoshop Overlays and my “very occasional” email. I want to talk with you about inspiration, photography, blogging and just staying motivated.
Leave A Comment